Legal Opinion

Eigenbrun v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff claimed certain property mentioned in the pleadings, under a deed of trust, executed by Robinson Holt, to H. T. Watkins, dated 17 March, 1886, and a bill of sale from the said trustee, and Robinson Holt, to himself, dated 19 March, 1886.

The defendant Smith is the sheriff of the county of Vance, and as such, levied upon and took possession of said property under execution, in favor of his codefendants, M. Cohen and Charles Cohen, who alleged that the deeds under which the plaintiff claims, were made to defraud creditors, and void, as against them, they being creditors.

The issues…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. FulfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Morehead Banking Co. v. WhitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. Bobbitt v. . RodwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Frank v. Robinson & HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. State Ex. Rel. Davenport v. McKeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parker, Holmes & Co. v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  2. Burlington Hotel Corp. v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Haynes v. HoffmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API