Legal Opinion

City of Hutchinson v. Ryan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1942No. 35,509PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*752The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This is an original proceeding in mandamus to compel •the defendants to return to the plaintiff certain municipal bonds.

We note that in our constitution and statutes there is variance in designation of the defendant board. Article 6, section 9, of our constitution provides that the state superintendent of public instruction, secretary of state and attorney general shall constitute “a board of commissioners for the management and investment of the school funds.” As all references hereafter made are to the General Statutes of 1935 we shall…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paola & Fall River Railway Co. v. Comm'rs of Anderson CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. Jones v. State ex rel. AtherbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
  4. Hooper v. McNaughtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Rogers v. SlonakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dolan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Paul v. City of ManhattanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. State v. RaschkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. Perry v. Planning Commission of the County of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Ambrosier v. BrownbackSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API