United States Ex Rel. Lacorte v. Wagner
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Reversed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judger KING joined.
OPINION
WILKINSON, Chief Judge:
Ramona Wagner and Jeanine Dehner seek to intervene in a qui tam action brought by two other individuals under the False Claims Act (FCA). 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1). Wagner and Dehner are the beneficiaries of the settlement of an earlier qui tam action which they brought against a different defendant. They now claim that the FCA permits them to intervene in the current suit because they were “but for” causes of a portion of the settlement that was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re United States of America, Ex Rel. S. Prawer and Company v. Fleet Bank of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States ex rel. Carson v. Manor Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United States ex rel. Wilson v. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- United States ex rel. Carter v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. L-3 Communications EOTech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Leocadio Barajas v. United States v. Northrop CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.