Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Lacorte v. Wagner

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 16, 1999No. 98-2629PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reversed by published opinion. Chief Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judger KING joined.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Chief Judge:

Ramona Wagner and Jeanine Dehner seek to intervene in a qui tam action brought by two other individuals under the False Claims Act (FCA). 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1). Wagner and Dehner are the beneficiaries of the settlement of an earlier qui tam action which they brought against a different defendant. They now claim that the FCA permits them to intervene in the current suit because they were “but for” causes of a portion of the settlement that was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. In Re United States of America, Ex Rel. S. Prawer and Company v. Fleet Bank of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Carson v. Manor Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States ex rel. Wilson v. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States ex rel. Carter v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. L-3 Communications EOTech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  5. United States of America, Ex Rel. Leocadio Barajas v. United States v. Northrop CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API