Legal Opinion

United States v. Cornelius J. Kehoe and Ray K. Bullock

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 5, 1978No. 76-4346PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In United States v. Kehoe, 573 F.2d 335 (5th Cir. 1978), we reviewed several alleged errors including defendants’ claim that their conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 657 violated double jeopardy. While rejecting the defendants’ other contentions, we relied on United States v. Jenkins, 420 U.S. 358, 95 S.Ct. 1006, 43 L.Ed.2d 250 (1975) to hold that the § 657 conviction abridged the Double Jeopardy Clause. Subsequently, the Supreme Court expressly overruled Jenkins in United States v. Scott, - U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 2187, 57 L.Ed.2d 65 (1978). The portion of our opinion relying on Jenkins, 573 F.2d at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. Cornelius J. Kehoe and Ray K. BullockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Louis RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Ronald C. Brechtel and Phillip H. GattusoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Don Stovall and Robert Harlon "Frosty" WinterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. KehoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API