Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronald C. Brechtel and Phillip H. Gattuso

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 21, 1993No. 92-3342PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Per curiam

Ronald Brechtel and Phillip Gattuso appeal their convictions of unlawful participation in benefits from savings and loan transactions, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1006. Finding no reversible error in either Brechtel’s or Gattuso’s convictions, we affirm.

Background

Brechtel and Gattuso served as directors of Enterprise Federal Savings & Loan (EFS & L). Brechtel also served as secretary of the board and as a member of the loan committee. In addition to their involvement with EFS & L, Brechtel and Gattuso had interests in the Saulet and Ames Farm partnerships, two real estate development…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. United States v. Terry Burton KimbroughCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. PettigrewCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. ReaganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. CasillaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. GrimesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API