Legal Opinion

United States v. Cornelius J. Kehoe and Ray K. Bullock

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1978No. 76-4346PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge:

Defendants Kehoe and Bullock allege several errors that they argue require reversal of their conviction for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1006. 1 The facts allegedly consti tuting this criminal violation are extremely complex. From 1969-1971, defendants Bullock and Kehoe were directors of the Surety Savings Association, a federally insured corporation. Surety owned a 7.2 acre tract of land in Houston on which it wanted to build an office building, but state savings and loan regulations limited the amount of money that such institutions could invest in office real…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Louis RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Ronald C. Brechtel and Phillip H. GattusoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Don Stovall and Robert Harlon "Frosty" WinterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Robert Harris CartwrightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Cornelius J. Kehoe and Ray K. BullockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API