Legal Opinion

Pikeville Coal Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 14, 1997No. 95-81TPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBINSON, Judge:

This tax refund case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss and plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment.

Plaintiff, Pikeville Coal Company,1 seeks tax refunds for years 1978, 1979, and 1980. During the years in question, Pikeville was a wholly-owned domestic subsidiary of Stelco, Inc. (“Stelco”), a Canadian corporation. Plaintiff sold coal to Stelco. Plaintiff wants to correct the prices for which the coal was sold, thereby requiring a downward adjustment in its taxable income. The Internal Revenue Service (“I.R.S.”) adjusted the coal prices.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Commissioner v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Passamaquoddy Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Four Rivers Investments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Stelco Holding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. Stelco Holding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  5. Stelco Holding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API