Legal Opinion

Cahill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 1993No. 84 W.D. Appeal Docket 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

This is an appeal, by allowance, from an order of the Commonwealth Court 137 Pa.Cmwlth. 442, 586 A.2d 522, which reversed an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which had reversed a referee’s decision awarding disability benefits to the appellee-claimant, Robert Cahill. Under the Commonwealth Court’s decision, the appellant-employer, North American Coal Corporation, was ordered to pay total disability benefits retroactive to March 5, 1977, with credit for partial disability benefits already paid.

At issue is whether the Commonwealth Court’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Upset Sale, Tax Cl. Bureau of BerksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Cerny v. Schrader & Seyfried, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Pittsburgh Press Co. & Vigilant Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Cahill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Corp./CBS v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Fulton v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Russo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Corrections & CompServices, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API