Legal Opinion

Fulton v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 4, 1998PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) erred by finding that Terrance Fulton 1 (Claimant) was not totally disabled when he and the Philadelphia School District (Employer) entered into a commutation agreement.

Claimant appeals from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the WCJ’s decision dismissing Claimant’s petition to reinstate total disability benefits.

On May 2, 1989, Claimant sustained an injury to his lower back while working for Employer as a maintenance trainee. On September 6,1989,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. American Refrigerator Equipment Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. General Electric Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Northeastern Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Hartner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gary v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Jackson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Russo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Morgan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Corrections & CompServices, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API