Legal Opinion
Hartig v. Safelite Glass Corp.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 27, 1993No. 91-1358-PFKPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PATRICK F. KELLY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff brought claims charging violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34 (ADEA), breach of an implied contract of employment, misrepresentation, breach of a stock option agreement, and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing implied in the stock option agreement. Defendant moved for summary judgment with respect to all claims.
Plaintiff Donald Hartig was employed by defendant Safelite Glass Corporation in December of 1978. There was never an express contract governing his employment.
In 1987,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alfred St. Louis v. Texas Worker's Compensation Commission, Texas Worker's Compensation CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Berry v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Vernon v. Cassadaga Valley Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Conyers v. Safelite Glass Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Schartz v. Unified School District No. 512District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.