Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Connall

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 29, 1986No. 6999-1-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.

James and Verna Hoffman, husband and wife, appeal the dismissal of their claims against Bryan G. and Connie J. Connall, their real estate broker, Charles Huggins, and Cardinal Realty, Inc., for their alleged innocent misrepresentation of the boundaries of rural property they purchased from the Connalls. They argue: (1) the evidence is undisputed as to the misrepresentation; (2) the realtor breached his duty to take reasonable steps to avoid disseminating false information to them; (3) certain testimony of Mr. Huggins constituted inadmissible hearsay; (4) a default judgment should have been…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Gazija v. Nicholas Jerns Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Lyons v. Christ Episcopal ChurchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Bevins v. BallardAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Tennant v. LawtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harkala v. Wildwood Realty, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Hoffman v. ConnallWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Hoel v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Hoel v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Hoffman v. ConnallWashington Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API