Legal Opinion

Hoel v. Rose

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 4, 2005No. 52860-2-IPublished

1Opinion of the Court

105 P.3d 395 (2004)

Dale M. HOEL, a single man; Michelle D. Jones, a single woman, both as their separate property, Respondents,

v.

Betty Jo ROSE and John Doe Rose, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof; Nancy Hudson and John Doe Hudson # 1, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof; Donna Hudson and John Doe Hudson # 2, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof; and Troy Rose and Jane Doe Rose, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof, Appellants.

No. 52860-2-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

November 1,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. ESCA Corp. v. KPMG Peat MarwickWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. ESCA Corp. v. KPMG Peat MarwickWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. BaikWashington Supreme Court · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API