State v. Hill
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Neterer, J., entered October 2, 1906, upon a trial and conviction of the crime of forgery.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The appellant was found guilty of having forged the name of one Julia Raab to a check on the First National Bank of Bellingham, and by means of the forged check, having obtained from the bank the sum of $295, the property of Julia Raab. This appeal is from the judgment pronounced upon the verdict of guilty.
The assignments of error set out in the brief can be reduced to two principal contentions: first, that the evidence was insufficient to justify a verdict of guilty; and second, *695that the court erred in the admission of certain evidence. The contention that the evidence is insufficient to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. PayneWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. FairWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- State v. CoatesWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MordenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. PeeplesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. CrowderWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.