Legal Opinion

State v. . Ellis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

After describing the wound the first witness for the State testified that Beauchamp’s death bad been caused by “the bullet that went through bis bead.” He bad -not qualified as an expert witness and for this reason the defendant excepted to the testimony. Considered in the light of all the evidence the conclusion of the witness seems to be self-evident; but conceding for the moment that bis opinion is technically within the domain of expert evidence (S. v. Jones, 68 N. C., 413), we think the error, if any, was cured by testimony subsequently offered by the defendant. Dr. Greene, a witness for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. MerrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. State v. . O'NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. State v. . BowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. State v. . TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. McNeill v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. . UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. State v. . GrassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API