Legal Opinion
Holliday v. Fields
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided February 20, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the C'ourt by
Judge Dietzman
Motion for a writ of prohibition denied.
In November, 1919, the people of Kentucky ratified an amendment to section 227 of our Constitution, so that the section as thus amended now reads (the added matter being that which follows the words “provided also”):
“Judges' of the county court, justices of the peace, sheriffs, coroners, surveyors, jailers, assesssors, county attorneys and constables shall be subject to indictment or prosecution for misfeasance or malfeasance in office, or wilful neglect in discharge of official duties, in such mode as may be…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lynch v. ChaseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
- Weaver v. ToneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Matter of GudenNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Pratt v. BreckinridgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- State ex rel. Starkweather v. Common Council of the City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Holliday v. Fields, GovernorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Johnson v. LaffoonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Commonwealth ex rel. Breckinridge v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1961
- Maynard v. Workmen's Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Mischler v. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.