Legal Opinion
Berdie v. Kurtz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1937No. 8142PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
' This appeal is from a decree in the District Court following the decision of this court (75 F.(2d) 898) declaring unconstitutional the Agricultural Adjustment Act, 48 Stat. 31 (U. S. v. Butler et al., Receiver of Hoosie Mill Corp., 297 U.S. 1, 56 S.Ct. 312, 80 L.Ed. 477, 102 A.L.R. 914) .under which the licenses authorizing collection of the money in issue was made directing the payment to appellees; and restraining appellants from demanding or endeavoring to collect from appellees money set out in their complaint.
October 10, 1934, the District Court entered an order…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Toledo, A. A. & N. M. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
- Spiller v. St. Louis & S. F. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Berdie v. KurtzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. SageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Jeppesen & Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1977
- Mallonee v. FaheyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
- In re BoyntonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1938
- In re BowmanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.