Legal Opinion

State v. McInally

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 24, 2005No. 53111-5-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — Daniel Mclnally was charged with one count of rape of a child in the second degree. The State and Mclnally stipulated to a bench trial on agreed documentary evidence and entered into an “Agreement Upon Stipulation (Sentencing Reform Act)” (Agreement).1 As part of the Agreement, Mclnally stated the description of his criminal history was complete and accurate. The State agreed not to charge Mclnally with a second count of rape of a child in the second degree and, based on McInaH/s criminal history, agreed to recommend a Special Sex Offender Sentencing Alternative (SSOSA). In the course of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Badgett v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. BobicWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. BobicWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State Of Washington v. Taylor Alexandra ChurchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. State v. McInallyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. City of Spokane v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API