Legal Opinion

Norton v. Schmucker

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1892No. 3136PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHEB, Judge,

Section B.—This suit was brought in form of trespass to try title, by appellant, against appellee Schmucker, and against appellees W. A. Trammell and his wife M. E. Trammell, to recover $450 for breach of the covenants of general warranty contained in a deed executed by the Trammells to appellant, wherein they conveyed the land in controversy. The petition is in the ordinary form, and alleges that defendant Schmucker is a trespasser on the land by an unlawful entry by him. The petition prays, that if plaintiff is not successful in the suit for the land, then he have judgment…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Felts v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Freeman v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Biggs v. DoakCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Hoffman v. DicksonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Simonton v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API