Biggs v. Doak

Appellant sued Doak and wife, appellees, in substance, alleging, in his first original and supplemental petitions, that h-es had purchased from defendants, by general warranty deed, a lot in Pecos, relying upon the false representation made to him by the defendants that they had perfect title thereto- in fee simple, in consideration of $500 paid in cash and a purchase-money note for like amount; that possession of the lot had been denied him by H. Heisterman. who was in possession under paramount title acquired by limitation of 10 years; that he was ignorant of th-ej possession and claim of…