Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Dickson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1911No. 9798PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Easterday, J., entered July 12, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs upon one cause of action, and dismissing another cause of action, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for breach of covenant.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

— The plaintiffs seek recovery of damages from the defendants for alleged breach of a covenant of warranty contained in a deed of conveyance from the defendants to the plaintiffs for lots 21 and 22, in block 1104, of New Tacoma, Washington Territory, now a part of the city of Tacoma. The grounds upon which relief is sought are. set forth in the plaintiffs’ complaint in two separate causes- of action. The first relates to the title to lot 21, and the second relates to the title to lot 22. The questions here presented arise upon the rulings of the trial court in sustaining the defendants’…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bronson v. CoffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Hubbard v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1835
  3. Mackey v. HarmonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  4. Rex v. CreelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Richmond v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Double L Properties, Inc. v. CrandallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  2. Foltz v. MansonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Kershner v. WalcottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. City of Walla Walla v. A. M. Jensen Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Coffey v. Baker's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API