Pedler v. Aetna Life Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
This case involves the applicability of principles of equitable estoppel. The sole issue before this court is whether an insurer may enforce the limitation on eligibility for coverage clearly stated in its master policy and in literature distributed to the insured despite the acceptance of premium payments and the issuance of a certificate specifying greater coverage. We answer in the affirmative and, in so doing, hold that an insurer is estopped from denying the full value of coverage stated on the insurance certificate, based upon limitations or exclusions contained in the master policy,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Talley v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers, Local No. 377Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Kirkpatrick v. Boston Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Norma R. Davis and Grover C. Davis, Her Husband v. Crown Life Insurance Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Bain v. BENEFIT TRUST LIFE INSUR. CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Investor's National Life Insurance v. NorsworthyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Duriak v. Globe American Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Turner Liquidating Co. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Heskett v. PauligOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- City of Cleveland v. Association of Cleveland Fire Fighters, Local 93Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Fifth/Third BankDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.