Legal Opinion

Skolnick v. Illinois State Electoral Board

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 31, 1969No. 69 C 755PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM, FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECREE

2Per curiam

Plaintiffs acting pro se have brought this action on their own behalf and on behalf of, “all other voters, residents, citizens, taxpayers and persons similarly situated”, and seek to set aside the present apportionment plan for Illinois Congressional Districts. The present districts were formulated and adopted in December 1965 by joint action of this court and the Supreme Court of Illinois. Kirby v. Illinois State Electoral Board, 251 F.Supp. 908 (1965) and People ex rel. Scott v. Kerner, 33 Ill.2d 460, 211 N.E.2d 736 (1965). The…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Wells v. RockefellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Kirby v. Illinois State Electoral BoardDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965
  4. People Ex Rel. Scott v. KernerIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Skolnick v. Illinois State Electoral BoardDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carstens v. LammDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1982
  2. Skolnick v. State Electoral Board of IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
  3. Skolnick v. Illinois State Electoral BoardDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
  4. (1971), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1971
  5. Skolnick v. State Electoral Board of IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API