Skolnick v. Illinois State Electoral Board
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, FINDINGS . OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECREE
Before FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judge, and CAMPBELL and AUSTIN, District Judges. PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs acting pro se have brought this action on their own behalf and on behalf of, “all other voters, residents, citizens, taxpayers and persons similarly situated”, and seek to set aside the present apportionment plans of the Illinois Senate and House of Representatives, both of which were adopted in 1965, alleging that these plans do not comply with the most recent constitutional standards for apportionment as set forth in the United States…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Wells v. RockefellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smith v. CherryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- In Re the Legislative Districting of General AssemblySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Skolnick v. Mayor of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970
- Ramos v. State of Ill.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Skolnick v. Illinois State Electoral BoardDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.