Legal Opinion

Automobile Ins. Co. v. Teague

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1931No. 1187—5522PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShort, P. J.

In this case there were two applications for writ of error successfully prosecuted, one by the plaintiffs in error, the Automobile Insurance Company, and the Fire & Marine Underwriters Agency, the two companies being substantially the same, and the other by the Century Insurance Company, Limited, of Ed-inburg, Scotland.

The judgment rendered in the Court of Civil Appeals reforms the judgment rendered in the district court, which was in favor of the Chickasaw Lumber Company, a partnership *152in so many words, but as' well, substantially, also in favor of H. R. Teague, the original plaintiff,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lipscomb v. FuquaTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hoffer Oil Corp. v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Borden v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Dublin Electric & Gas Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Automobile Ins. Co. v. TeagueTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Rangers Management, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. CrutchfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Dilbeck v. Bill Gaynier, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. WestmorelandTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. McCarthy v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API