Legal Opinion

Dilbeck v. Bill Gaynier, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 17, 1963No. 16175PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

This trespass to try title suit involves the construction of a provision in a deed which appellants contend is a condition subsequent or, in the alternative, a covenant. Alleging a breach of the provision, the appellants sue for a forfeiture of title as for breach of condition, and, in the alternative, for damages arising out of the breach of the covenant. Both parties moved for summary judgment; appellants’ motion was overruled and that of appellee sustained.

We have concluded that the provision in question did not create a condition subsequent. Considering, without deciding,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gardner v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. W. T. Carter & BrotherTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Cartwright v. TruebloodTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Couch v. Southern Methodist UniversityTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  5. Texas Electric Railway Co. v. NealeTexas Supreme Court · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dewhurst v. Gulf Marine Institute of Technology, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  2. GC Murphy Company v. LackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1993
  4. Lacy v. HoffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Golden Spread Oil, Inc. v. American Petrofina Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API