Dilbeck v. Bill Gaynier, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BATEMAN, Justice.
This trespass to try title suit involves the construction of a provision in a deed which appellants contend is a condition subsequent or, in the alternative, a covenant. Alleging a breach of the provision, the appellants sue for a forfeiture of title as for breach of condition, and, in the alternative, for damages arising out of the breach of the covenant. Both parties moved for summary judgment; appellants’ motion was overruled and that of appellee sustained.
We have concluded that the provision in question did not create a condition subsequent. Considering, without deciding,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gardner v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. W. T. Carter & BrotherTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Cartwright v. TruebloodTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Couch v. Southern Methodist UniversityTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Texas Electric Railway Co. v. NealeTexas Supreme Court · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dewhurst v. Gulf Marine Institute of Technology, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
- GC Murphy Company v. LackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1993
- Lacy v. HoffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Golden Spread Oil, Inc. v. American Petrofina Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.