Automobile Ins. Co. v. Teague
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtShort, P. J.
In this case there were two applications for writ of error successfully prosecuted, one by *825the plaintiffs in error, the Automobile Insurance Company and the Fire & Marine Underwriters Agency, the two companies being substantially the same, and the other by the Century Insurance Company, Limited, of Edin-burg, Scotland.
The judgment rendered in the Court of Civil Appeals reforms the judgment rendered in the district court, which was in favor of the Chickasaw Lumber Company, a partnership in so mány words, but as well, substantially, also in favor of H. R. -Teague, the original plaintiff,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hugo v. SeffelTexas Supreme Court · 1899
- Young v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Ricker, Lee & Co. v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Greenwade v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Reid v. FernandezTexas Supreme Court · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fisher Construction Company v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Weber v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Elliott v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Universal Automobile Ins. Co. v. CulbersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Automobile Ins. Co. v. TeagueTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.