Legal Opinion

Automobile Ins. Co. v. Teague

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 26, 1930No. 1187-5522PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShort, P. J.

In this case there were two applications for writ of error successfully prosecuted, one by *825the plaintiffs in error, the Automobile Insurance Company and the Fire & Marine Underwriters Agency, the two companies being substantially the same, and the other by the Century Insurance Company, Limited, of Edin-burg, Scotland.

The judgment rendered in the Court of Civil Appeals reforms the judgment rendered in the district court, which was in favor of the Chickasaw Lumber Company, a partnership in so mány words, but as well, substantially, also in favor of H. R. -Teague, the original plaintiff,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hugo v. SeffelTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Young v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Ricker, Lee & Co. v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Greenwade v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Reid v. FernandezTexas Supreme Court · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fisher Construction Company v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  2. Weber v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Elliott v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Universal Automobile Ins. Co. v. CulbersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Automobile Ins. Co. v. TeagueTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API