Legal Opinion
AIELLO v. GRUBELIC
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 1, 2021No. 1:20-cv-17227Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE : BRYON AIELLO and MELISSA AIELLO, : : Plaintiffs, : Civil No. 20-17227 (RBK/KMW) : v. : OPINION : MARK GRUBELIC and KATHLEEN : GRUBELIC and JOHN DOE (1-10) : : Defendants. : : KUGLER, United States District Judge: This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (Doc. 4). For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Remand is GRANTED. Plaintiffs also seeks an award of attorneys’ fees and costs that they incurred due to Defendants’ improper removal of the action to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Shamell Samuel-Bassett, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Benjamin Blackburn v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Patricia KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Robert Stallworth v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority David Vegh and Ronald ToberCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Stephens v. GentilelloDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012