Legal Opinion

Ford v. Savage

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Kent; Grove, J. Assumpsit by John H. Eord against Emeri J. Savage for money paid in discharge of certain mortgages on land conveyed by defendant to plaintiff. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The statement of facts prepared by coun-sel for defendant’ is so terse and clear that it is adopted here:

*145“This is an action of assumpsit. Prior to March 14, 1892, plaintiff was the owner of a house and lot in the city of Grand Rapids, Mich., incumbered by a mortgage of $1,850, and some accrued interest and back taxes, which he had placed in the hands of Averill & Frary, real-estate agents, for exchange for property with less incumbrance. Defendant was the owner of a house and lot in Coopersville, Mich., incumbered by two mortgages,'—one of $200 and one of $300, each with some accrued…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Abell v. MunsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Strohauer v. VoltzMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. McEwan v. OrtmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Doty v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Cook v. BellMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ruch v. RuchMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Scovel v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Hagan v. MochMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Clark v. LoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Eckler v. AldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API