Ford v. Savage
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Grove, J. Assumpsit by John H. Eord against Emeri J. Savage for money paid in discharge of certain mortgages on land conveyed by defendant to plaintiff. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The statement of facts prepared by coun-sel for defendant’ is so terse and clear that it is adopted here:
*145“This is an action of assumpsit. Prior to March 14, 1892, plaintiff was the owner of a house and lot in the city of Grand Rapids, Mich., incumbered by a mortgage of $1,850, and some accrued interest and back taxes, which he had placed in the hands of Averill & Frary, real-estate agents, for exchange for property with less incumbrance. Defendant was the owner of a house and lot in Coopersville, Mich., incumbered by two mortgages,'—one of $200 and one of $300, each with some accrued…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Abell v. MunsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Strohauer v. VoltzMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- McEwan v. OrtmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Doty v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Cook v. BellMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ruch v. RuchMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Scovel v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Hagan v. MochMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Clark v. LoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Eckler v. AldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.