Legal Opinion
In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McMurray
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1983No. C.D. 4099PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.
In this case we review the Disciplinary *922Board's recommendation that respondent attorney, Joseph C. McMurray, be suspended from practice for 18 months for three violations of the Discipline Rules for Attorneys. We conclude that there are no reasons for departing from the Board's recommendations and accordingly suspend Mr. McMurray from practice for 18 months.
Proceedings against respondent were formally initiated with a complaint filed with the Washington State Bar Association on May 5, 1982. The complaint alleged three counts of violations of the disciplinary rules. Count 1 alleged violations…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DenendWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Alpha Investment Co. v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against TalbotWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against YamagiwaWashington Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re the Personal Restraint of RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against ScannellWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against ScannellWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Santacruz-HernandezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- In Re the Personal Restraint of RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.