Paul v. Workforce Safety & Insurance
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Ronald Paul appealed from a district court judgment, entered upon remand by this Court, affirming orders of February 13, 2001 and August 7, 2001 by Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”), 1 approving a vocational rehabilitation plan for Paul and denying him further disability and vocational rehabilitation benefits. We hold WSI’s proceedings were in accordance with this Court’s directions in remanding the case, its findings of fact are supported by the evidence, and its decisions are in accordance with the law. We, therefore, affirm the district court judgment upholding…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Paul v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Lucier v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Bachmeier v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gray v. North Dakota Game and Fish Dept.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Genter v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Beckler v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Ringsaker v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re BecklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.