Legal Opinion

Baum v. Metro Restoration Services, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 9, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-cv-00787-CRS-CHLPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

Charles R. Simpson III, Senior Judge

I, Introduction

This matter is before the Court on the motion of Defendant Metro Restoration *687Services (“Metro Restoration”) for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a), ECF No. 18. Plaintiff Jonathan C. Baum responded, ECF No. 23. Metro Restoration replied, ECF No. 24. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant in part and deny in part the motion for summary judgment.

II. Background

A. Metro Restoration and Baum’s Work Schedule

Metro Restoration is a restoration company that remediates property after severe…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Dale Ross v. Campbell Soup CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Swift Transportation Services, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
  2. Gravity Diagnostics, LLC v. Kevin BerlingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023
  3. Janice Hamilton v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API