Legal Opinion

James v. Clayton

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 21, 1937No. 3857PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHateield, Judge

This is an appeal in an interference proceeding from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention to appellees.

*1330The intereference involves the application of Benjamin Clayton, Walter B. Kerrick, and Henry M. Stadt, Serial No. 534,533, filed May 2, 1931, and an application of Edward M. James, Serial No. 567,220, filed October 6, 1931.

The invention in issue relates to a process for the purification of vegetable and animal oils, and is sufficiently described in the counts; in issue.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Swain v. BoothDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co. v. Refining, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  2. Interstate Cotton Oil Refining Co. v. Refining, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1938
  3. Scinta v. AndersonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API