Legal Opinion

Scinta v. Anderson

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 18, 1952No. Patent Appeal 5821PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal in an interference proceeding from -a decision of the Board of Interference Examiners awarding priority of invention of the subject matter of the single count to appellee.

The application of appellants, Serial No. 736,492, for “Windshield Cleaner” was filed March 22, 1947. The application of appellee with the same title, Serial No. 634,730, was filed December 13, 1945. In response to a request by the Primary Examiner for a more specific title, appellee changed his title to “Windshield Wiper Blade Linkage Assembly.” Appellants, being the junior party, have the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Josserand v. TaylorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  2. Robins v. WettlauferCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  3. Briggs v. KaislingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. Boileau v. GodfreyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  5. Crane v. GrierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson Company v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., and Zaiger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  2. Anderson Co. v. Trico Products Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1958
  3. Dwaine R. Franklin v. Robert J. HopperCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API