Legal Opinion

Plant v. Internal Revenue Service

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 25, 1996No. 5:96-cv-01236PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DOWD, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Philip R. Plant, proceeding in a pro se fashion, filed this action challenging the levying of his wages for the purpose of collecting federal income tax. He named as defendants the Internal Revenue Service (hereinafter “United States”); 1 three IRS employees, F.M. Krauss, John Mazur and C. Ashley Bullard; his former employer, Morton International Industrial Coatings, and “J. Does.”

The Court granted Morton International’s motion to dismiss on July 30, 1996 (Docket No. 6). The remaining named defendants with the exception of Mazur,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Viola v. A. & E TELEVISON NETWORKSDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Bell Consumers, Inc. v. LayDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API