Plant v. Internal Revenue Service
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DOWD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Philip R. Plant, proceeding in a pro se fashion, filed this action challenging the levying of his wages for the purpose of collecting federal income tax. He named as defendants the Internal Revenue Service (hereinafter “United States”); 1 three IRS employees, F.M. Krauss, John Mazur and C. Ashley Bullard; his former employer, Morton International Industrial Coatings, and “J. Does.”
The Court granted Morton International’s motion to dismiss on July 30, 1996 (Docket No. 6). The remaining named defendants with the exception of Mazur,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Viola v. A. & E TELEVISON NETWORKSDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Bell Consumers, Inc. v. LayDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2002