United States v. The Honorable William P. Gray, United States District Judge
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, Circuit Judge.
These cases have been consolidated for argument and decision. In each case, the respondent, over the objection of the petitioner, accepted a plea of guilty to what he believed was a lesser offense necessarily included in the offense charged in the indictment. The petitioner now demands that we issue a writ of mandamus directed to the respondent, requiring him to set aside the guilty pleas and allow each case to proceed to trial.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In Case No. 26639, defendant Faust was charged by indictment with the offense of possession of stolen mail in violation of 18…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Blackburn JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,897 Will L. Clegg v. Leo H. ConkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. The Honorable William P. Gray, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- State v. CoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Kashansky v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.