Legal Opinion

Brandt v. Brandt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 13, 1972PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFobt, J.

This suit seeks to set aside a property settlement agreement and a decree of divorce on the ground of fraud. It does so, not by an appeal from the divorce decree nor by a motion pursuant to OBS 18.160, nor by a motion directed to the alimony award incorporated both in the decree and the challenged property settlement agreement, but by an original suit based upon fraud.

The challenge to the agreement itself is based principally on the inclusion of a piece of real estate at its appraised rather than its market value. Its value in the agreement is stated to be $17,600. Plaintiff contends in fact…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Carmichael v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Taylor v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Evans v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Sturm v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harder v. HarderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. In re the Marriage of HansenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. In re the Marriage of FreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. Southern Idaho Production Credit Ass'n v. Ruiz ex rel. RuizIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Harder v. HarderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API