Legal Opinion

Stoll v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 23, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County. In Equity. (Bhasiikabs, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.

By the bill of complaint in this case the Court was asked to specifically enforce a contract of sale for two acres of land in Anne Arundel County. The defendant answered and set up- as the ground for defense that the appellees- could not, convey a good and merchantable title.

The land in question was pail, of a larger tract of twenty acres. This had been sold in December, 1830, by William Legg as trustee under a decree of a Court of Chancery to the predecessor in title of the vendors in the contract of sale, the appellees here, and he and his heirs have been in actual, continuous and exclusive…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crook v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. Trustees of Sharp Street Station of the Methodist Episcopal Church v. RotherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  3. Love v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  4. Rieman v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Noel v. NoelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  2. Killen v. HouserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Blanch v. CollisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  4. Ivy Hill Ass'n v. KluckhuhnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Kluckhuhn v. Ivy Hill Ass'n, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API