Legal Opinion
Kluckhuhn v. Ivy Hill Ass'n, Inc.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 8, 1983No. 1190, September Term, 1982PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the appointment of a receiver suspends the running of the limitations period required to establish adverse possession with respect to real property that came within the receiver’s charge after adverse possession had commenced. We hold that it does not.
On April 28, 1953, the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County appointed Walter M. Cole "receiver, with full power to demand, sue for, collect and receive and take into his possession all the property and estate, including without limitation credits, monies, lands and tenements, books, papers, and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Tatlebaum v. Pantex Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Day v. Postal Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
- Mayor of Baltimore v. Chesapeake Marine Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Nicholas v. Salisbury Hardware and Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Gump v. SibleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- District of Columbia v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Consumers United Insurance v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In re Jefferson CountyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012
- Voge v. OlinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Ivy Hill Ass'n v. KluckhuhnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.