Legal Opinion
Killen v. Houser
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 26, 1965No. [No. 314, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOppEnhEimER, J.
For the first time in the turbulent history of the George Washington Cemetery, 1 the rights of the lot owners emerge into legal cognizance. Houser, the appellee, filed a bill of com plaint in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County against Killen, the appellant, alleging they were both trustees of the Care Fund of the George Washington Cemetery, Inc. (the Cemetery Company) and that Killen had violated his trust in converting a portion of the trust funds in the amount of $16,000 to his own personal use and in causing the unlawful investment of trust funds in an unsecured promissory note…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brack v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Partridge v. First Independent ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
- Brown v. Maplewood Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Reed v. StoufferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
- Bollack v. BollackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Parish v. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Harding v. Ja Laur Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Simms v. ConstantineCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- United States v. $119,030.00 in U.S. CurrencyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2013
- LEVIN, SUBSTITUTE RECEIVER OF MONUMENTAL CITY SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Security Financial Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.