Orwick v. Orwick
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUTZ, Judge.
The plaintiff has made a motion in this court for temporary support and alimony to be awarded to her pending her husband’s appeal, as well as for attorney fees for preparation of a brief and for appearance in this court. Counsel for the plaintiff states that it is undisputed that the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear such motion, but that the jurisdiction of the district court to hear and pass on the motion is disputed by the defendant. In order to have the matter determined as rapidly as possible, the plaintiff has filed her motion in this court.
Generally, when an appeal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bryant v. BryantNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- Hermes v. MarkhamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Swindle v. SwindleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Atkinson v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Zundel v. ZundelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Routledge v. RoutledgeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Siewert v. SiewertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Porter v. PorterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Investors Title Insurance Co. v. HerzigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Muraskin v. MuraskinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.