Tomten v. Thomas
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MR, CHIEF JUSTICE ADAIR:
*160This was a condemnation proceeding by M. E. Tomten, plaintiff, to acquire a private way of necessity over land belonging to Mr. and Mrs. Henry Thomas, defendants. The jury’s verdict was for plaintiff. It found the necessity of the road and assessed $250 as the amount of all damage to be sustained by the defendants by the opening thereof.
Defendants filed a memorandum of their costs and disbursements within the time prescribed by R. C. M. 1947, section 93-8619. The cost bill included an item of $750 for attorneys’ fees for defendants’ counsel. This item was disallowed on…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Montana Ore Purchasing Co. v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
- Welton v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Sherman v. BuickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. WarfordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Sears v. Inhabitants of NahantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bowers v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Detroit Edison Co. v. JanoszMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- City of Ottumwa v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. OlsenMontana Supreme Court · 1975
- Franks v. TylerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.