Legal Opinion

Reinert v. Roberts

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1931No. Docket No. 98, Calendar No. 35,595PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

By the decree in Reinert v. Roberts, 250 Mich. 387, plaintiffs herein were entitled to an accounting against defendants, and the case remanded to the circuit court therefor. The accounting has been had and a decree entered thereon in the circuit court. Both plaintiffs and defendants claim error in the accounting and have appealed. Before passing upon the accuracy of the accounting, we will consider other questions presented by the record and briefs now before us.

The circuit judge decreed there was due to plaintiffs $11,460.28 together with interest thereon from the date to which computation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Township of Hart v. NoretMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Upham v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Reinert v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. De Keyzer v. MisnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API