Legal Opinion

De Keyzer v. Misner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1932No. Docket No. 47, Calendar No. 36,148PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

This is an appeal from the circuit judge’s order dismissing appellant’s petition filed under Court Rule No. 4, by which petition it was sought to have defendant ordered to pay to petitioner money claimed to have come into defendant’s possession while he was acting as attorney for petitioner. The pertinent portion of Court Rule No. 4 reads :

“The circuit court of the county in which any attorney resides has jurisdiction in all matters in which the relationship of attorney and client exists, and, on verified written complaint of any client, * * * and hearing of such complaint, may make any order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Niagara, Lockport & Ontario Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. In re the Minnesota Phonograph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Reinert v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Reinert v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maljak v. MurphyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API