Legal Opinion

Butler v. Vanagas

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 20, 1997No. 9206-04303; CA A93232PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant in this legal malpractice case. We affirm.

This is our second decision in this case. Our previous opinion adequately states the basic facts. Butler v. Vanagas, 135 Or App 1, 897 P2d 1176 (1995). As relevant to this appeal, plaintiffs allege that defendant, 1 who represented them in an age discrimination case against Portland General Electric (PGE), was negligent in responding to PGE’s motion for summary judgment in that case. They assert that he should have included additional evidence in opposing that motion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. City of Portland v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Callan v. Confederation of Oregon School AdministratorsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. Consolidation Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Montgomery v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Moore v. Consolidation Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API