Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. Board of Education
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 5, 2003No. 581-021-0034-4-00; A117678PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
Petitioners seek review of a decision of respondent State Board of Education that held that respondent Oregon School Activities Association (OSAA) did not unlawfully discriminate when it refused to agree to adjust the Class 2A boys’ basketball tournament schedule to ensure that the student petitioners (the students) 1 would not be scheduled to play on their Sabbath. Petitioners Andy Montgomery, Greg Nakashima, and Anthony Nakashima are students at the Portland Adventist Academy (PAA) who play or have played on PAA’s basketball team. The remaining petitioners are their parents. 2 We dismiss…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HardisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
- Nakashima v. Oregon State Board of EducationOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Nakashima v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Nakashima v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014