Legal Opinion

Moore v. Consolidation Coal Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2002No. 29992PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGRAW, Justice.

Appellants in this case are eight coal miners 1 who brought suit against appellee Consolidation Coal Company (“Consol”) under the West Virginia Human Rights Act (the “Human Rights Act”), W. Va.Code §§ 5-11-1 to -20, alleging that Consol, in the process of closing its Arkwright mine in 1995, systematically discriminated against them on the basis of age by transferring younger employees to other mine operations while leaving them to face termination when the mine ultimately shut down. Following trial on these claims, the jury found in favor of Consol, and appellants now appeal…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Knotts v. Grafton City HospitalWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. West Virginia Human Rights CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Ruckel v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2003
  4. Pittsnogle v. West Virginia Department of TransportationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Beach v. DXC Technology CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API