Legal Opinion
Klingner v. City of Braham
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 8, 2001No. CIV. 00-1667 ADM/AJBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On January 18, 2001, the undersigned United States District Judge heard Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 7] on Plaintiffs’ claims for (1) “Deprivation of Property without Due Process of Law”; (2) “Negligent Performance of Public Duties”; (3) “Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations”; and (4) “Conspiracy to Deprive Plaintiffs of Civil Rights.” Compl., ¶¶ 7-10. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion is granted.
II. BACKGROUND
Gerald Klingner and Gary…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Patel v. CITY OF SAUK CENTREDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Satanic Temple, The v. Belle Plaine, City ofDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020