Legal Opinion
Patel v. CITY OF SAUK CENTRE
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 3, 2007No. Case 05-CV-2866 (PJS/RLE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the objection of plaintiffs Sudha Patel and Bholae, Inc., to the April 20, 2007 Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of Chief Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson. The Court has reviewed de novo those portions of the R & R to which plaintiffs have objected, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), has considered carefully all of plaintiffs’ objections, and adopts Judge Erickson’s thorough and well-reasoned R & R [Docket No. 42].
ORDER
Based on the foregoing and on all of the files, records, and…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- JDC MANAGEMENT, LLC v. ReichDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Let Them Play MN v. WalzDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- Monique Annette Doward v. City of Kettle River; David Lucas, Mayor of Kettle River, in his individual and official capacities; Kathy Lake, City Clerk of Kettle River, in her individual and official capacities; Sarah Sonsalla, City Attorney for Kettle River, in her individual and official capacities; and Advanced Utility SolutionsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026