Legal Opinion
United States v. Gatling
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 3, 2009No. Cr. 94-0298(TFH)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendant Lance Lamont Gatling’s pro se Motion to Modify Term of Imprisonment Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 591 to the Sentencing Guidelines. After careful consideration of the motion, the government’s opposition, Gatling’s reply, and the record in this case, the Court finds that Amendment 591 has no bearing on Gatling’s sentence. Accordingly, the Court will deny the motion.
BACKGROUND
After a six-day trial in January of 1995, a jury found Gatling guilty of seven charges: assault on a federal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Matthew Mark MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. SettlesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- United States v. George RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Wyche v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- McCain v. Bank of America, NaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. Lance GatlingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Lance GatlingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012