Legal Opinion

Wyche v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 23, 2004No. CIV.A.01-1585(RMU). No. CRIM.A. 89-0036-05(HHG)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA, District Judge.

Granting the Petitioner Leave to File an Amended Section 2255 Motion; Denying the Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel; Granting the Respondent’s Motions to Dismiss; and Denying the Petitioner’s Section 3582 Motion

I. INTRODUCTION

The pro se petitioner initiated this habe-as action by filing a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The matter now comes before the court on the respondent’s motions to dismiss as untimely the petitioner’s section 2255 motion. Also before the court are the petitioner’s…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. WaiteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  2. United States v. GatlingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  3. United States v. GatlingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  4. United States v. MeriseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  5. United States v. UpshurDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API